![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
Linking Campaigns: Consistency is the Key to Successby Trey Pennewell
Published on this site: September 2nd, 2006 - See more articles from this month
The problem that arises from this link building strategy is that a webmaster will write, or hire a writer, to create a large number of articles. The webmaster will then insist that all of these newly created articles be sent out immediately. Submitting all of these articles at one time, say within a week, will devalue the links that you are creating with the articles. Imagine submitting 100 or 1,000 articles in a single week to a variety
of sources. What do you think the response will be from the websites and
newsletters that accept free reprint articles? Often times the results
are quite poor and leave the webmaster disappointed with the low number
of back links that are created from this link building campaign. I actually operate a website that accepts free reprint articles and many webmasters submit to it in hopes of getting their articles published on it. If one source submits a ridiculously large amount of articles at once, I generally delete all of these articles and publish none of them! The reason for this? Mainly, I do not want my website to appear to be a website for the submitter. In other words, I do not want my website to appear to be overly-associated with the submitter's website. Now let's say that a submitter tells the article distributor to submit 10 articles a week over the course of two and a half months. This will often result in a much higher publication rate and, consequently, a larger number of back links to the submitter's site. Imagine being the publisher of a newsletter or ezine and opening your
inbox to find that the same person has submitted 1,000 articles to you
in one week. What do you think your reaction would be? Would your reaction
be to block this author from your inbox? Would you try to publish 100
of the articles in your weekly newsletter? As you can see, overwhelming the sources that accept
your free reprint articles will often backfire for you as a internet marketer. Spreading out the distribution of your articles actually creates a positive impression with the sources to whom you are submitting articles. With the website that I operate, I have come to know who my regular submitters are and the quality of their work. It is common for me to publish the articles submitted by a writer or webmaster that has consistently shown that he or she submits quality work. This person has shown me in the past that he or she is not only a good writer, but is also submitting relevant articles. The Rule of 7 in marketing suggests that after a person has seen your
name 7 times, that they will come to recognize your name as an authority
and a trusted source. What this means to you, as you distribute free reprint
articles, is that a publisher becomes more likely to use your articles
after he or she sees your name on a consistent basis and comes to recognize
you as a person that submits quality articles. If you were to get 52 links in a week, a search engine might think that you are going to create 52 links a week every week. When they see that you are not creating any more links for the rest of the year, you will penalized by your search engine results placement. You should determine how frequently you can develop content, and then
set your distribution schedule accordingly. If you can only create one
article per month, then you should only distribute one article per month.
One per week, one per month, your frequency is not important. What is
important is your consistency. Matt Cutts recently made mention in a video on his blog about one
such case here: This thought process should be applied to creating links as well. The bottom line is that consistency is the key to success, when it comes to creating back links to your website. Create a consistent back linking pattern and you will see better results from the search engine ranking algorithms.
|
||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |