Managers: Don't Write off Public Relations!
by Bob Kelly
Published on this site: October 15th, 2005 - See
more articles from this month

There are those among America's managerial cadre who will
write off public relations because they've been getting little
more for their PR dollar than brochures, special events, reporter
chatter and press releases.
While they have a right to expect more a LOT more,
from their PR investment, truth is, they ARE getting valuable
tactical devices which they can call upon from time to time
to move a message from here to there.
But it's what they are NOT getting that causes unhappiness
with their business, non-profit, government agency or association's
current public relations expenditure.
Like assembling the resources and action planning they need
to alter individual perception leading to changed behaviors
among their most important outside audiences. And doing something
to persuade those important folks to their way of thinking,
then moving them to take actions that allow their department,
group, division or subsidiary to succeed.
No wonder they decide to write off public relations!
What they need is the right public relations plan, one dedicated
to getting every member of the PR team working towards the
same external audience behaviors which insures that the organization's
public relations effort stays sharply focused.
Not just any plan, but one based on a solid approach to public
relations. One, perhaps, like this: people act on their own
perception of the facts before them, which leads to predictable
behaviors about which something can be done. When we create,
change or reinforce that opinion by reaching, persuading and
moving-to-desired- action the very people whose behaviors
affect the organization the most, the public relations mission
is usually complete.
That manager shouldn't have to wait long for results to appear,
such as membership applications on the rise, bounces in showroom
visits; new proposals for strategic alliances and joint ventures;
customers making repeat purchases; prospects starting to work
with them; and capital givers or specifying sources looking
their way.
Heads up managers always get results with this approach by
finding out who among their key external audiences is behaving
in ways that help or hinder the achievement of their objectives.
Then, they list them according to how severely their behaviors
affect their organization.
Next they decide how most members of that key outside audience
perceive their organization. If resources to cover professional
survey counsel aren't there, the man- ager and his or her
PR colleagues will have to monitor those perceptions themselves.
Of course the PR folks should already be up to speed about
assessing and gathering perception and behavior data.
Once back in the field, they must meet with members of that
outside audience asking questions like "Are you familiar
with our services or products?" "Have you ever had
contact with anyone from our organization? Was it a satisfactory
experience?" And if you are that manager, you must be
sensitive to negative statements, especially evasive or hesitant
replies. Watch carefully for false assumptions, untruths, misconceptions, inaccuracies and potentially
damaging rumors. When you find such, you will need to take
steps to correct them, as they inevitably lead to negative
behaviors.
Now it's time to identify the specific perception to be altered
which then becomes your public relations goal. You obviously
want to correct those untruths, inaccuracies, misconceptions
or false assumptions.
Once you isolate your public relations goal, you immediately
need a strategy to show you how to get there. The wrong strategy,
of course, will taste like pickled beets on your Braunschweiger
sandwich. It's just not right.
When you pick out one of three strategies (especially constructed
to create perception or opinion where there may be none, or
change or reinforce it,) you must insure that the goal and
its strategy match each other. You wouldn't want to select
"change existing perception" when current perception
is just right suggesting a "reinforce" strategy.
Here you create a compelling message carefully constructed
to alter your key target audience's perception, as specified
by your public relations goal.
Fortunately, you can always combine your corrective message
with another news announcement or presentation which may give
it more credibility by downplaying the apparent need for such
a correction.
It seems obvious that the content of your message must be
compelling and crystal clear about what perception needs clarification
or correction. Of course you must be truthful and your position
must be logically explained and believable if it is to hold the attention of members of that target audience,
and actually move perception in your direction.
With our own PR jargon, you may notice folks in the PR business
alluding to the communications tactics necessary to move your
message to the attention of that key external audience, as
"beasts of burden" because they must carry your
persuasive new thoughts to the eyes and ears of those important
outside people.
Luckily, there is no shortage of communications tactics.
They include letters-to-the-editor, brochures, press releases
and speeches. Or, you might choose radio and newspaper interviews,
personal contacts, facility tours or customer briefings. There
are scores available and the only selection requirement is
that the communications tactics you choose be on record as
reaching people just like the members of your key target audience.
The good news is that you can always move things along by
adding more communications tactics, AND by increasing their
frequencies.
Someone is bound to bring up progress reports which will
lead you to return to the field again remonitoring perceptions
among your target audience members to test the effectiveness
of your communications tactics. Using questions similar to
those used during your earlier monitoring session, you'll
now be on read alert for signs that audience perceptions are
beginning to move in your general direction.
You will be well-served to keep your eye on the core of this
approach: persuade your most important outside audiences with
the greatest impacts on your organization to your way of thinking.
Then move them to take actions that help your department,
division or subsidiary prevail.
In this way, rather than measuring the narrow results achieved
by the tactical subsets of your public relations program like
special events, brochures, broadcast plugs or press releases,
you will have discovered the only true measure of public relations:
the results of your strategic efforts to alter individual
perception among your key outside audiences leading to changed
behaviors, helping you achieve your managerial objectives.
Put another way, instead of writing off public relations,
managers are best advised to assemble the resources and action
planning they need to achieve changed behaviors among their
most important outside audiences. Then do something to persuade
those important folks to their way of thinking, and move them
to take actions that allow their department, group, division
or subsidiary to succeed.

Bob Kelly counsels and writes for business, non-profit
and association managers about using the fundamental premise
of public relations to achieve their operating objectives.
He has published over 200 articles on the subject which are
listed at EzineArticles.com, click ExpertAuthor, click Robert
A. Kelly. He has been DPR, Pepsi-Cola Co.; AGM-PR, Texaco
Inc.; VP-PR, Olin Corp.; VP-PR, Newport News Shipbuilding
& Drydock Co.; director of communications, U.S. Department of the Interior, and deputy assistant press secretary,
The White House. He holds a bachelor of science degree from
Columbia University, major in public relations. mailto:[email protected]
Visit:www.PRCommentary.com

|