Why Not PR That Gets REAL Results?
by Bob Kelly
Published on this site: May 3rd, 2005 - See
more articles from this month...

And not results you can measure only in terms of magazine circulation,
TV audience numbers, or news release pickups.
But rather, results that come from a public relations effort that
creates the kind of key stakeholder behavior change that leads directly
to achieving your managerial objectives.
In other words, results that come from doing something positive
about those important outside audiences whose behaviors most affect
your operation. Particularly as you persuade those key external
audiences to your way of thinking by nudging them to take actions
that allow your department, division or subsidiary to succeed.
When you think about it, public relations boils down to these realities:
the right PR really CAN alter individual perception and lead to
changed behaviors that help you win. But your public relations effort
must involve more than parties, videos, booklets and column mentions
if you really want to get your money's worth. What you need is a
basic schematic that gets everyone working towards the same external
audience behaviors insuring that the organization's public relations
effort stays sharply focused.
Coincidentally, here is such a schematic! People act on their own
perception of the facts before them, which leads to predictable
behaviors about which something can be done. When we create, change
or reinforce that opinion by reaching, persuading and moving-to-desired-action
the very people whose behaviors affect the organization the most,
the public relations mission is usually accomplished.
Look at some real results that can come from this approach to public
relations. Membership applications on the rise; customers making
repeat purchases; capital givers or specifying sources looking your
way; new proposals for strategic alliances and joint ventures; prospects
starting to work with you; and even bounces in showroom visits.
You may be forgiven for wondering how such managers deliver those
kinds of results.
They take the time to analyze who among their most important outside
audiences behaves in ways that help or hinder the achievement of
their objectives. Then, they list them according to how severely
those behaviors affect their organization.
On the point, just how do most members of your key outside audiences
perceive your organization? If paying for professional survey counsel
isn't in the cards (or in the budget!), your PR colleagues will
have to monitor those perceptions themselves. Actually, they should
be quite familiar with perception and behavior matters since they're
already in that business.
So you meet with some of those outside folks asking questions like
"Are you familiar with our services or products? Have you ever
had contact with anyone from our organization? Was it a satisfactory
encounter?" And if you are that manager, you must be sensitive
to negative statements, especially evasive or hesitant replies.
And watch carefully for false assumptions, untruths, misconceptions,
inaccuracies and potentially damaging rumors. When you find such,
they will need to be corrected, as they inevitably lead to negative
behaviors.
Big job now is to pick out the actual, offending perception to
be changed, and that becomes your public relations goal. You obviously
want to correct those untruths, inaccuracies, misconceptions or
false assumptions.
The toughest part of this exercise is that a PR goal without
a strategy to show you how to get there, will taste like hot
sauce on your yogurt. So, as you select one of three strategies
(create perception or opinion where there may be none, or
change or reinforce it,) what you want to do is insure that
the goal and its strategy match each other. You wouldn't want
to select "change existing perception" when current
perception is just right suggesting a "reinforce"
strategy.
With your strategy in hand, you and your PR staff must create a
compelling message carefully written to alter your key target audience's
perception, as required by your public relations goal.
An idea to keep in mind: remember that you can always combine your
corrective message with another news announcement or presentation
which may give it more credibility by reducing the apparent need
for such a correction.
The art in preparing such a message lies in the fact that
the message you convey must be not only compelling, but quite
clear about what perception needs clarification or correction,
and why. Of course you must be truthful and your position
logically explained and believable if it is to hold the attention
of members of that target audience, and actually move perception
in your direction.
It's understandable when some folks refer to the communications
tactics necessary to move your message to the attention of that
key external audience, as "beasts of burden." In reality,
they must carry your persuasive new thoughts to the eyes and ears
of those important outside people.
The good news is that you have a really wide choice of communications
tactics because the list is a long one. It includes letters-to-the-editor,
brochures, press releases and speeches. Or, you might choose radio
and newspaper interviews, personal contacts, facility tours or customer
briefings. There are scores available and the only selection requirement
is that the tactics you choose have a record of reaching people
just like the members of your key target audience.
By the way, you can always speed up things by adding more communications
tactics, AND by increasing their frequencies.
Around this time, someone is bound to mention progress reports.
But you will already be hard at work remonitoring perceptions among
your target audience members to test the effectiveness of your communications
tactics. Using questions similar to those used during your earlier
monitoring session, you'll now become cross-eyed looking for signs
that audience perceptions are beginning to move in your general
direction.
You need actual changes in behaviors among your most important
external audiences, and that's no small matter. In my view, the
quality of your public relations results will, and should be directly
dependent on whether you spend your PR budget primarily on communications
tactics, or the creation of key stakeholder behavior change that
leads directly to achieving your managerial objectives.

Bob Kelly counsels, writes and speaks to business, non-profit
and association managers about using the fundamental premise of
public relations to achieve their operating objectives. He has been
DPR, Pepsi-Cola Co.; AGM-PR, Texaco Inc.; VP-PR, Olin Corp.; VP-PR,
Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.; director of communi-cations,
U.S. Department of the Interior, and deputy assistant press secretary,
The White House. He holds a bachelor of science degree from Columbia
University, major in public relations. mailto:[email protected]
Visit:http://www.prcommentary.com

|