Managing Praise and Criticism
by Arthur Cooper
Published on this site: April 29th, 2005 - See
more articles from this month...

When managing a group of people there are times when you should
give praise and times when you must hand out criticism. How and
where is the balance to be struck?
In the course of your life as a manager you must do both.
It is most unlikely that you have a team of constant peak
performers or on the other hand a team of complete duffers.
Since the chances are that your staff will fall somewhere
in between these two extremes you will at times have to criticise
and at other times praise.
Your object should always be to get the best out of your
staff and you need to bear this in mind. You don't criticise
bad work in order to feel better yourself. You do it to ensure
a better performance next time. You give praise not only to
show appreciation, but also to encourage even greater efforts
and achievements in the future.
Some people need constant encouragement. They lack confidence
in themselves and their abilities. They need constantly boosting
and building up. When dealing with them always look for justified
praise that you can give and be gentle in your criticism.
Others are too confident. They are so sure of themselves
that they don't listen to instructions properly and often
end up doing the wrong thing. These need restraining and redirecting
onto the right path. Criticism may just wash off them like
water off a duck's back, but don't let that stop you giving
it when it is needed.
Then you have the careless, the lazy, and the totally inept.
With them you need to apply all your skills to deploy praise
and criticism, the carrot and stick, as and when needed. By
a combination of praise, criticism, encouragement, and training
many of these people can be turned around to do a good job.
So modify your own actions according to the circumstances. Adjust
the balance of praise and criticism to suit the personality of the
person at the receiving end.
When praising, be careful about praising an individual in
front of all his colleagues. At times this can be absolutely
the correct thing to do. After all in the business world it
is not enough to be good you have to be seen to be
good. There is always a place for public recognition of excellent
performance. But beware of constantly singling out one team
member for public praise whilst neglecting all the others,
even if this is deserved. It can lead to resentment and accusations
of favouritism. It can result in team members refusing to
cooperate with the `star performer', and eventually a drop
off in the performance of the whole team.
Praise should be specific. A general comment of `well done'
is not good enough. You must show by your remarks that you
have taken enough interest to know just what it is that is
so praiseworthy. Show by the remarks you make that you really
mean what you are saying and understand the obstacles that
have been overcome.
Don't fall into the trap of constantly giving praise for
the smallest little thing. Don't be effusive over work that
should be part of normal day-to-day expectations. This just
devalues the praise that you give. After all, you are not
dealing with children who need to be encouraged at every step
but with adults paid to produce a certain expected minimum
performance. Save praise for something outstanding.
But don't go to the other extreme of constantly finding fault
and systematically criticising even the smallest little error
or shortcoming. Most people are aware of and regret their
occasional minor mistakes and will do their best to avoid
repeating them. They don't need to be reminded of them. If
all you ever do is criticise, then your staff will eventually
come to the conclusion that whatever they do will not be good
enough. They will stop trying.
If job performance really falls short of the requirement then of
course you must say so. Criticise the work whilst staying calm and
analytical. Base your comments on facts rather than opinions. Be
specific. Don't get angry and don't make personal attacks. Emphasise
how important it is to get the job done correctly. Always bear in
mind that the purpose of criticism is to get things done better
in the future.
Whatever you do, don't let the occasion become a monologue. Use
it to establish a two-way exchange of views. Criticism on its own
is not enough. Find out the causes. The meeting should be aimed
at finding a solution for the present and an improvement for the
future. Get the individual concerned to acknowledge his past mistake
and to agree on the actions to take to avoid its repetition.
Always try to end the interview on a lighter note. If you
can, refer to some other work by the same person that was
well done. Praise that piece of work in order to soften the
blow of your earlier criticism and to demonstrate that good
work is appreciated.
In conclusion, remember that the worst thing you can do to
any member of your staff is to ignore them. The worst thing
you can do is to let weeks go by without a comment of any
sort. The worst feeling anyone can experience is to be ignored,
forgotten, taken for granted, and undervalued. Show them that
you care one way or another and praise or criticise
as appropriate.

Arthur Cooper is a business consultant, writer and publisher.
For his mini-course `Better Management' go to:
http://www.barrel-publishing.com/better_management.shtml

|