Civil Rights Mockery: Mandatory Arbitration Strips Employees
of Hard Won Rights
by Dr. Rhonda Hackett
Published on this site: April 8th, 2005 - See
more articles from this month...

So, you thought the Civil Rights movement was over. The sixties
are long behind us, and ever since then America has led the
free world in upholding our most basic civil liberties and
rights at all costs, right? Think again. While we rest on
our laurels and tout the passage of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 as proof of our nations insistence on fairness,
equality, and as support for our self-proclaimed status as
leader of the free world, employers all over the country blatantly
thumb their noses at what can only be called our alleged civil
rights.
Like many of you, I operated on the basic assumption that
if my civil rights were ever threatened I could have my day
in court. Not so. If you happen to have an employer who insists
on you signing a contract with a mandatory binding arbitration
clause, you my friend, are up the proverbial creek without
a paddle. Agreeing to arbitration I did because I wanted
the job, never presumed Id experience a violation of
my civil rights simply means you waive your federal
law given right to have that day in court. In essence, your
civil rights have no meaning in the context of arbitration
because you cannot go to court to protect them.
You see, arbitration is a private forum that subjects you to a
secret process that is not required to follow or uphold the letter
of the law. Moreover, the secret system has absolutely no checks
and balances in place. In our public system, judges are required
to follow precedent and make their legal rulings on the record.
Arbitrators, on the other hand, are not even required to be familiar
with the law, much less know it, relevant to any case they are hearing;
nor are they required to offer an explanation for their ruling.
If you go to court and the judge or jury seems to have misinterpreted
the law in your case, you can appeal the decision. If an arbitrator
makes such an error, it does not matter. You are stuck with his
or her mistake. Case closed.
If you believe you are being discriminated against because of
your gender, race, age, or a disability and your employer has you
bound by the mandatory arbitration clause, forget seeking justice
in the public court system that your tax dollars help pay for. In
my case, my pocket book was $80,000 plus change thinner after arbitration
fees and attorney fees incurred while I pursued my claim of gender
discrimination. An exorbitant amount? Sure, but know that most such
cases will set you back a cool $20,000-$50,000 at a minimum, depending
on who you ask. Can Americas Everyman afford this system?
Arbitrators and their supporters will argue that they are impartial
in all cases they hear. Give me a break. They are paid by employers
who are often repeat customers. An employer, who insists on including
a binding arbitration clause, has more than one employee and obvious
potential for continued business. As an individual bringing a case
under the auspices of arbitration you only get one shot. No appeal
or recourse remember? Who do you think the arbitrator will want
to keep happy? And remember, he or she can engage in this seeming
unethical behavior, because that is what this secret system allows.
Whats in this for employers? A stacked system in their favor;
getting rid of disgruntled employees in a quicker manner than the
public court system would allow; freedom to push the limits of the
law, if not conduct business on the outskirts; and comfort in knowing
that only a small percentage of their employees will ever be able
to afford this private and secret system of so-called justice.
Attorneys, legal scholars, consumer advocates, employee advocates,
the EEOC, every federal agency charged with enforcing labor and
civil rights laws, government commissions, and believe it or not,
the National Academy of Arbitrators and the Society of Professionals
in Dispute Resolution, all slam the use of mandatory arbitration
in discrimination cases. Despite this unwavering denouncement employers
are increasingly turning to mandatory arbitration clauses and as
a society we allow the travesty to continue. Resist such clauses
and demand that your law makers put this issue on the front burner.
Lets not allow our civil rights to continue to be the joke
mandatory arbitration has turned them into.

Dr. Rhonda Hackett is an advocate working to right social
wrongs. She writes a regular column for the Denver Homeless Voice
Newspaper and lives in the Denver Metro area.mailto:[email protected]

|